Legal Opinion

Deere & Webber Co. v. Moch

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1942No. File 6826PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover possession of three items of farm machinery sold by the Farmers Company to the defendant. The property is described in'a “sale contract” which constitutes the basis upon which the plaintiff claims a right to-recover possession of the property. This contract, which was assigned’ to the plaintiff, dated December 11, 1939, reads as follows:

“Received of Farmers Company, Avhose post office address is Kintyre, State of North Dakota, the following described personal property:

One John Deere Model D Tractor with rubber front tires and 12— 75x28 Rear…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. HockingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Casey Land AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Northwestern Cordage Co. v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Needham v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hagert v. Hatton Commodities, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States Rubber Company v. Eugene BauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Roberts Distributing Co. v. Kaye-Halbert Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Mousel v. WidickerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Payne v. Valley Motor Sales, IncorporatedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API