Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. Hocking

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure $1,925, the purchase price of certain threshing machinery consisting of a separator, feeder, weigher, and wind stacker. The indebtedness was represented by two notes: One for $300 given for the stacker and one for $1,625 the balance of the purchase price. The stacker note was paid in 1921, and plaintiff seeks to satisfy the second note by this foreclosure.

The complaint is the ordinary complaint in foreclosure. The defendant, in his answer, admits the giving of the notes and mortgage and alleges that they were given for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rokusek v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Casey Land AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cadillac Machine Co. v. Mitchell-Diggins Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Comptograph Co. v. Citizens BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. GeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Cleveringa v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Haugen v. Ford Motor CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API