Legal Opinion

Hagert v. Hatton Commodities, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1984No. Civ. 10455PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Powell from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in a case involving defective seed. Powell also appealed from the order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Rule 50(b), NDRCivP) or, in the alternative, for a new trial (Rule 59, NDRCivP). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Hagert Farms purchased certified Wyoming 166 pinto bean seed .from Hatton Commodities and planted them in two plots irrigated by overhead center pivot systems. It soon became evident that the bean plants were infected with a disease identified as “halo blight,”…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Tioga Public School District 15 of Williams County, State of North Dakota v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API