Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Sherman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1993No. 92-63PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Shirley Davidson, Kimberly Pauli, and Melissa Baxter, appellants, filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Wyoming Department of Family Services, as administrator of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program, must set the standard of need at a level commensurate with actual need. Appellants also, for themselves and others similarly situated, sought to recover the amount of child support payments wrongfully retained by the State when it employed the incorrect standard of need. The district court, citing its lack of authority because of separation of powers,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rosie Quarles v. Fred St. Clair, Individually and as Commissioner of the Mississippi State Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bredthauer v. TSPWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. First Wyoming Bank, N.A. v. Continental Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API