Legal Opinion
Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 2002No. A095196PublishedCited by 13 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Jonathan Cobb appeals a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., 1 § 1094.5) reviewing a rent control decision of the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board (Rent Board). Cobb sought to set aside the Rent Board’s decision establishing the base rental of his tenant, Richard Passalacqua, as $600. He contends he is entitled to a base rental of $1,500 under the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (Civ. Code, § 1954.50 et seq.; Costa-Hawkins Act).
Factual Background 2
Since 1984, Cobb has owned and resided in one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Getz v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sunburst Bank v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mosser Companies v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.