Legal Opinion

Mosser Companies v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 2015No. A141134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

— Mosser Companies (landlord) owns a nine-unit residential apartment building on Fell Street in San Francisco. The apartment is subject to rent control under San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (S.F. Admin. Code, § 37.1 et seq.; ordinance), which limits rent increases to tenants in occupancy {id., § 37.3, subd. (a)). Under Civil Code section 1954.53, which provides that “an owner of residential real property may establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit . . .” (id., subd. (a)), local jurisdictions are authorized to impose…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sierra Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp.California Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foster v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Colonial Manor, Inc. v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. Colonial Manor, Inc. v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Kaileh v. San Francisco Residential Rent etc. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Lara v. MenchiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API