Legal Opinion

Hinz v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 13, 1971No. 54932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

At the conclusion of a jury trial a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant then filed its written motion for a directed verdict alleging plaintiff’s failure to plead and prove the six month notice required by the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act statute. Defendant’s motion was granted and judgment was entered in favor of defendant notwithstanding the verdict. On appeal plaintiff contends that action of the trial court was improper.

On October 17, 1963, plaintiff was injured as a result of a collision between an automobile she was operating and a vehicle operated by an agent of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walters v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Minnis v. FriendIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Erford v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ouimette v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hayes v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Antol v. Chavez-PeredaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Searcy v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Yokley v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Streeter v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Margolis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API