Legal Opinion
Eustace v. Dechter
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1942No. Civ. 12976PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, P. J.
This action, as well as related litigation arising from the same basic facts, has previously occu pied the attention of appellate courts (see Eustace v. Lynch, (1935) 80 F. (2d) 652; Eustace v. Dechter, (1938) 28 Cal. App. (2d) 706 [83 P. (2d) 523]; Eustace v. Lynch, (1941) 43 Cal. App. (2d) 486 [111 P. (2d) 372]). The present appeal is by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in a malicious prosecution action. The sixth amended complaint was framed in two counts. In the first count plaintiff avers that “defendants . . . maliciously and without probable cause, conspired and agreed among…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Black v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Eustace v. DechterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Appleton v. WaessilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.