Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Sibley

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1911No. Civ. No. 799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. P. H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The defendant, W. F. Sibley, was the sheriff, the defendant, A. H. Ashley, the district attorney, and the defendant, George F. McNoble, the assistant district attorney of San Joaquin county during all the times mentioned 'in the complaint. The Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland was the surety on the official bond of said Sibley, and John N. Stennett, the other defendant, was, it is alleged in the complaint, “a thief and perjurer who bartered his testimony to other defendants herein for immunity from crime. ’ ’

Among the allegations against these defendants is that “they corruptly,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Harkrader v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Booraem v. Potter Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Clark v. AllowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Plumley v. MockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Cowles v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Black v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API