Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Krueger

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 29, 1980PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

This case raises the question whether a California decree purporting to terminate a modifiable Connecticut alimony decree must be enforced in this state, either under the full faith and credit clause of the United States constitution or as a matter of comity, where the California court acted without first establishing the Connecticut decree as a California judgment. Our short answer to this question is no.

The parties to the present case were divorced in Connecticut by a judgment dated May 27, 1966. Under the terms of the decree the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $300 per month as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  2. Farricielli v. Connecticut Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Hayes v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API