Krueger v. Krueger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
This case raises the question whether a California decree purporting to terminate a modifiable Connecticut alimony decree must be enforced in this state, either under the full faith and credit clause of the United States constitution or as a matter of comity, where the California court acted without first establishing the Connecticut decree as a California judgment. Our short answer to this question is no.
The parties to the present case were divorced in Connecticut by a judgment dated May 27, 1966. Under the terms of the decree the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $300 per month as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Farricielli v. Connecticut Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hayes v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.