Yellow Cab Co. v. Hodgson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter
Marie Hodgson, defendant in error, will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff, and the Yellow Cab Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, as defendant. F. D. Allen, who was a party defendant in the trial court, is not a party to this writ, and as to J. F. Kinsella and J. J. Kinsella, as copartners, who were originally made parties defendant, the complaint was dismissed and no cross-error is assigned. Upon trial, judgment was rendered on the jury’s verdict in favor' of plaintiff and against defendant and Allen. Defendant prosecutes this writ, assigning numerous errors, but since one of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. RoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Barnes v. Danville Street Railway & Right Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Stangy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hilzer v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- St. Lukes Hospital Ass'n v. LongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Miller v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Bernardi v. Community Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.