Legal Opinion
Miller v. Brazel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1962No. 6748PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
The appeal is from a judgment entered after a jury verdict and from an order denying Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict and Motion For New Trial.
The appellants, James E. Miller and Betty Miller, are husband and wife, the other three named appellants are their minor children. All were plaintiffs below and appellee Brazel was defendant below. In this opinion, the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant or as Miller and Brazel.
The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile collision between vehicles driven…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Atlas Building Products Co. v. Diamond Block & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Swanson v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Globe Cereal Mills v. Shirlee S. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., an English Corporation v. F. Carroll FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Comins v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Billy R. Prebble v. Gordon BrodrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- W. C. Case v. Dan C. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Eleanor Ely, Administratrix of the Estate of Elmer L. Ely, Deceased v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Zelinger v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Century Refining Company v. Charles T. Hall, Charles T. Hall, Cross-Appellant v. Century Refining Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.