Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1968No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

In these appeals, appellants attack the Constitutionality of the Muncy Act. * The Muncy Act provides a mandatory and exclusive procedure and sentencing provisions for women convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.

Appellant Jane Daniel Avas found guilty of robbery (by a Judge sitting without a jury) and was sentenced to the Philadelphia County Prison for a term of from one to four years. Shortly thereafter, the trial Judge vacated the sentence and resentenced Jane Daniel under the provisions of the Muncy Act to an indeterminate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Muller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Goesaert v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API