Legal Opinion

Youlian v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1947No. L. A. 19576PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This case has been before this court previously. (Estate of Hultin, 28 Cal.2d 340 [170 P.2d 16].) Therein we decided that the motion to dismiss the appeals would not be granted on the ground of untimeliness in the preparation and filing of the transcripts for the reason that appellants should be relieved from their default in that respect. We now have before us for disposition the application of appellants Nadia Williams and Mae Barr for a writ of supersedeas, and respondents’ motion to dismiss the pending appeals for asserted lateness in the filing of the notices of appeal from the judgment…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Bell v. HummelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Manson, Iver & York v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API