Legal Opinion

Childers v. Seay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1967No. 284PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Appeal by Defendant Childers.

Defendant Childers assigns as error failure of the court to grant his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit; error in the charge on the first issue with respect to negligence of defendant Seay; and failure of the court to charge the jury on the second issue involving the alleged negligence of Childers with respect to the doctrine of insulating negligence.

Childers’ motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit was properly overruled. There was ample evidence of negligence on the part of defendant Childers to go to the jury. Defendant Childers’ own evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Godfrey v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Taylor v. . RiersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gregory v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Barber v. ConstienCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Oakwood Acceptance Corp., LLC v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Maye v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API