Legal Opinion

Payne v. Real Estate Commissioner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1949No. Civ. 7655PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Petitioner, Payne, filed a petition for a writ of mandate against the Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California to compel him to restore petitioner’s real estate license and his business opportunity license which had been' revoked by the commissioner. A demurrer to the petition was sustained without leave to amend, and petitioner appeals .from the judgment entered against him.

A .real estate broker’s license and a business opportunity broker ’s license were issued to petitioner several years prior to July 1, 1947, and on said date licenses for the fiscal year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hall v. ScudderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Golde v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Denny v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Karrell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Goldberg v. BargerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API