Legal Opinion
Colpe Investment Co. v. Seeley & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 8630PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An action for damages based upon the alleged fraud of the defendant while acting as the agent of plaintiff and its assignors.
It was alleged that defendant concealed, with intent to deceive, the material facts concerning the terms, premiums and types of insurance coverage procurable upon properties of plaintiff and its assignors which defendant was employed to keep insured, and falsely represented that such terms, premiums and types of insurance coverage procured upon said properties were the best that could he procured for adequate coverage thereon.
The complaint consisted of six…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ferrar v. Western Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Brown v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Scharles v. N. Hubbard Jr. & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- Burges v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hamacher v. TUMYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Marano v. SabbioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Roberts v. SunnenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.