Scharles v. N. Hubbard Jr. & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Hew York, dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
The complaint having been dismissed at the close 'of the plaintiffs’ case, it follows that upon this appeal the plaintiffs are entitled to the benefit of the most favorable inferences which are deducible from the evidence. The defendant is a domestic corporation engaged in the business of an insurance broker. The present action is predicated upon the claim that the defendant negligently procured for the plaintiffs a policy of fire insurance which was void, and that by reason of this fact the plaintiffs are unable to recover upon it, although they have suffered the loss against which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hardy v. Lancashire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Burges v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Benedict v. . Ocean Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Landusky v. BeirneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Wolfswinkel v. GesinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Hawkeye Clay Works v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Curacao Trading Co. v. William Stake & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- National Factors, Inc. v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.