Legal Opinion
Pinto v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 10, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1699PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, minor K.P.R. and his parents, bring this case under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., to challenge in part a Hearing Officer’s decision denying tuition reimbursement and prospective placement of K.P.R. at the Lab School of Washington. The matter is now before the Court on a motion by defendant District of Columbia to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The District contends that plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Scolaro v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections and EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams ex rel. T.J. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Morris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pinto v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- D.M. v. Seattle School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Silva v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.