Legal Opinion
D.M. v. Seattle School District
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 21, 2016No. CASE NO. C15-1390-MATPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD AND DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs (“Parents”) brought this action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq., to appeal an administrative proceeding related to their child’s education in the Seattle School District (“District”). Now pending before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (Dkt. 10), and plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT v. Q.M.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- J.M. v. SUMMIT CITY BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Northshore School District v. A.J.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- P B v. Thorp School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021