Legal Opinion
Pinto v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1699PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH A. ROBINSON United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs, Nils Rafael Pinto and Marta Rivera, in their own right and on behalf of K.P-R., their minor child, commenced this action pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., challenging the portion of a Hearing Officer Determination (“HOD”) denying tuition reimbursement and prospective placement of K.P-R. at the Lab School of Washington as a remedy for denial of a free appropriate education (“FAPE”). Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Document No. 1), ¶¶…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Roark Ex Rel. Roark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- L.R.L. Ex Rel. Lomax v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Q. C-C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lague v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- H.R. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- N. T. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- N. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.