Congo v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Barbieri,
In this parole revocation appeal, we are called upon to determine whether the appeal of Petitioner, Lamont Congo, is “wholly frivolous” so as to entitle his appointed counsel leave to withdraw. Congo appealed an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that recommitted him as a convicted parole violator to serve the entire remaining balance of his unexpired term, seven years, three months, and thirteen days. It is counsels petition for leave to withdraw that is before the Court at this time.
The following facts are pertinent to our…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Craig v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Chapman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Smith v. Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Reavis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Banks v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lotz v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Ward v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.