Legal Opinion
Reavis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 11, 2006No. 1531 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Keith Reavis (Inmate) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) recommitting him to serve 24 months’ backtime as a technical and convicted parole violator. Donald T. Gibboney, Esquire (Counsel), Inmate’s appointed counsel, petitions for leave to withdraw. Because the issues raised in Inmate’s Petition for Review are wholly frivolous, we affirm the Board’s order and grant Counsel’s petition.
In 1983, Inmate received a prison sentence of 2 to 8 years (original sentence). During the next seven years, the Board paroled and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Zerby v. ShanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hughes v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Miskovitch v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Encarnacion v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Stroud v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.