Craig v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Senior Judge Barbieri,
In this case we are called .upon to assess (whether counsel (appointed under the mandate of Bronson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 491 Pa. 549, 421 A.2d 1021 (1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1050 (1981), to assist .an indigent parolee in appealing a parole revocation order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation land Parole (Board) has met the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Specifically, we must consider counsel’s request to withdraw .and determine what, if .any, .rights petitioner' may have as to further representation.
T…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Zerby v. ShanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hughes v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Reavis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Adams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.