Legal Opinion

Burke v. Valley Lines, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1992No. 143PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Armstrong County which granted appellees’ motion for post-trial relief. Herein, we are presented with a question of first impression: Whether an injured motorist is required to obtain the full policy limit under his own uninsured motorist coverage before he may collect a judgment from a tortfeasor who is covered by the Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Association Act?

Our answer is that, as a general rule, an injured person may not settle with his uninsured motorist carrier for less than the policy limits and then…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Corcoran v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Prutzman v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Hasemann v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Panea v. IsdanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Company Image Knitware, Ltd. v. Mothers Work, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API