Legal Opinion
Panea v. Isdaner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 10, 2001PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*786ORIE MELVIN, J.:
¶ 1 The instant appeals present common questions concerning the proper application of § 991.1817(a), the non-duplication of recovery provision of the Pennsylvania Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association Act (the Act). 40 P.S. §§ 991.1801-1820.1 In the first two cases the parties reached a settlement prior to trial, and the defendants’ insurer was subsequently ordered into liquidation before the settlement funds were disbursed. In the third case the defendants’ insurer was ordered into liquidation and following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff an offset was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lurie v. Republican AllianceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Shay v. Flight C Helicopter Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Odyssey Contracting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.