Legal Opinion

State v. . Livingston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStact, C. J.

The confession of the defendants made under the inducement that the chances were “it would be lighter on them” if they would say they got the property, coupled with the remark of the officer, “it looks like you had about as well tell it,” must be regarded as arising out of circumstances which render it involuntary, and, therefore, incompetent as evidence against appellant. S. v. Myers, ante, 381; S. v. Whitener, 191 N. C., 659, 132 S. E., 603; S. v. Jones, 145 N. C., 466, 59 S. E., 353; S. v. Horner, 139 N. C., 603, 52 S. E., 136.

Almost the identical question here presented, certainly the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
  2. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. Horner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. State v. Martha Matthews.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API