Legal Opinion
In Re Joe S.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 9, 1999No. 1 CA-JV 98-0140, 1 CA-JV 98-0145PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal consolidates two cases arising from juvenile court deadlines foreclosing restitution. Due to a conflict between two recent opinions of this court, In re Frank H., 193 Ariz. 433, 973 P.2d 1194, 281 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28 (App.1998), and In re Alton D., 193 Ariz. 98, 970 P.2d 452, 285 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10 (App.1998), we reopen the issue and publish this opinion to address a significant distinction between these cases.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 After both juveniles entered plea agreements requiring restitution to the victims, the juvenile courts notified each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- In Re Eric L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- In Re Frank H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Alton D.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000