Legal Opinion

Davies v. Broadcom Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 8, 2015No. Case No. SACV 15-0928 AG (JCx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, AND DENYING MOTION TO FILE UNREDACTED COMPLAINT

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

In this case, Plaintiff Jennifer Davies (“Plaintiff’) asserts ten' claims against her former employer, Broadcom Corporation (“Defendant”), related to her past employment.' There are four motions before the Court: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss,” Dkt. No. 17), which is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; (2) Defendant’s Motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SteppeChange LLC v. Veon Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Frohm v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Hawkins v. ZennerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Kambic v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Alaska · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API