Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Zenner

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 26, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00788Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Meredith Hawkins, et al., No. CV-24-00788-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Shonda Zenner, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the court is Defendants Shonda and Thomas Zenner’s Amended 16 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of subject matter and personal 17 jurisdiction, improper venue, and failure to state a claim due to inadequate pleading under 18 Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 17.) For the following reasons, 19 the motion will be denied in part and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API