Legal Opinion
Raudenbush v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1945No. Civ. A. No. 3777PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiff as administratrix under the provisions of the Safety Appliance Acts, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-16, the Boiler Inspection Acts, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 22, 23, and the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover damages for the death of the decederlt, her husband, which occurred as a result of injuries sustained on February 2, 1944, in the course of his employment as a brakeman for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, the defendant. There is no question that the decedent came within the coverage of the Acts in so far as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AebySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Railway Company v. Arthur J. RiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946