Legal Opinion

Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1946No. 3777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as administratrix, brought suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover damages for the death of the decedent, her husband, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant railroad. A jury trial was had, and verdict was returned for the plaintiff. On defendant’s motion, this Court, on November 21, 1945, 63 F.Supp. 329, set aside the verdict and ordered entry of judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff now moves for a new trial, assigning certain errors and-additional reasons therefor, to be considered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. SeckingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Tobin v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Reed v. KellermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Raudenbush v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API