Jandorf v. Patterson
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. (Adsit, J.) Bill to set aside a deed and mortgage on the ground of fraud, and to compel the defendants to refund the money paid by complainant. Defendant Stone appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Defendant Patterson is a real-estate broker, and defendant' Stone was the owner of certain real estate. Complainant, who is about 23 years of age, is a baker by trade, and had saved up 1500. Patterson induced Jandorf to join with him in the purchase of the *42Stone property at $7,000, representing that it was a bargain at that figure. Jandorf at first declined, saying that he had but $500, but Patterson agreed that he would pay $L,100 of the purchase price, which, in addition to the $500, would make $1,600; that the balance would be secured by mortgage, Jandorf giving to Patterson his individual…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Gidney v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Stoney Creek Woolen Co. v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Mettetal v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Lightner v. KarnatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.