Legal Opinion

Gloeser v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1938No. Docket No. 101, Calendar No. 39,807PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff on May 11, 1937, filed a declaration against defendants alleging fraud in the sale of certain syndicate certificates in an oil company. Upon answer being filed, plaintiff moved for a summary judgment supported by an affidavit executed by himself. Defendants Charles Van Keuren, personally and as trustee, Arthur R. Morris, personally and as trustee, and the Morris-Van Keuren Oil & Gas Syndicate No. 2, caused affidavits of merits to be filed to prevent the taking of a summary judgment.

Plaintiff set forth in his affidavit that in the early part of January, 1935, one John Moore, agent of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Glover v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. O'Neill v. KunkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Nationwide Motorist Association of Michigan, Inc. v. Gurn Freeman and Jack FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. D'ALESSANDRO v. Vander HooningMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Schwartz v. SandidgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API