Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1999No. 98-1796PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Although respondent was convicted of a felony relating to his cocaine addiction, any penalty must be tempered by respondent’s demonstrated commitment to drug counseling and rehabilitation. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 51, 53, 693 N.E.2d 1078, 1079, citing Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 93, 666 N.E.2d 1087. In light of respondent’s demonstrated commitment to sobriety, his cooperation with law enforcement officials, his four-year supervised release with conditions, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McElrathOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GarrityOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. LazzaroOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. JarabekOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API