Legal Opinion

State v. Ronald Junior Cotton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1990No. 8815SC1152PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it allowed the State to introduce testimony from the defendant’s employer that the defendant, who was on trial for rape and other offenses, had touched female employees in a sexually offensive manner and had made sexually offensive comments to the female employees. Under the particular facts of this case, we find no reversible error.

The defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree rape, two counts of first-degree sex offense and two counts of first-degree burglary.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. FultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas Moore, Jr. v. Michael HardeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. James Richardson v. Joyce KornegayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. State v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. SuddrethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API