Legal Opinion

State v. Knox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8527SC306PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

Defendant contends the court erred in granting the State’s motion to suppress the testimony of Dr. Gary Thomas Long, a professor of psychology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte whom defendant offered to provide expert evidence on memory variables affecting eyewitness identification. Defendant sought through Dr. Long’s testimony to challenge the accuracy of the victim’s recollection of defendant as one of the perpetrators of the crimes. He maintains that the victim mistakenly identified him as a perpetrator and that he did not participate in the crimes, though…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Thomas Moore, Jr. v. Michael HardeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. State v. HardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. PurdieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API