State v. Fultz
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant brings forward five issues on appeal. He argues that these convictions should be reversed because the indictments were insufficient to inform him of the nature of the charges against him. Alternatively, he contends that this court should grant him a new trial because the trial court erred in joining all of the offenses for trial, admitted certain incompetent evidence, and excluded competent evidence offered by . the defense. After a careful review of the record, we hold that defendant received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.
Defendant contends that the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Ronald Junior CottonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. FriendCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.