Legal Opinion

Gage v. Arkansas Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The circuit court was right in directing a verdict for appellee. It is true that railroad companies are bound to have all reasonable and necessary facilities and appliances for conducting and carrying on their business in a prompt, skilful, and careful manner, but they are not bound to be prepared for unusual contingencies which no ordinary prudence or foresight could reasonably foresee or anticipate. So that it has been held in this State, where, an unusual contingency has arisen winch unexpectedly increases the business of a railroad company, it will be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GraysonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Clay County Gin Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Hines v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Murphy Hardware Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mobley v. Conway County CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Cain v. CarlleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United Brick & Clay Workers Union Local No. 602Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Martin v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API