Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. Hollowell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Erom the Madison Circuit. Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint by appellee, as a shipper, against the appellant, as a common carrier, to recover damages for delay in receiving and transporting live-stock. The complaint originally contained three paragraphs, but the second one was withdrawn; the case, therefore, stands upon the first and third paragraphs. A demurrer, for the alleged want of facts, was overruled to each paragraph of the complaint. The appellant answered by a general denial, and six special paragraphs, numbered from one to seven inclusive. Demurrers were overruled to the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh paragraphs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SearsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Condict v. Grand Trunk Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Parsons v. HardyNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. MortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Blackstock v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Empire Transp. Co. v. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Geismer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API