Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 29, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 1686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.

The decision of this Court heretofore filed1 has been subject to much misinterpretation.

The opinion, reduced to its lowest terms, held that each common carrier, whether trucker or railroad, has a duty at common law and .under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., to receive, transport and deliver goods in accordance with its holding out or the engagement of its posted tariff.2 This duty is almost absolute,3 since the car*522rier is excused only if performance is prevented by the act of God or the public enemy. Because neither of these defenses was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Rockaway News Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen & Helpers, Local 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Rockaway News Supply Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Citizens Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Aladdin Industries, Inc. v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1961
  4. Kerrigan Iron Works, Inc. v. Cook Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Merchandise Warehouse Co. v. A. B. C. Freight Forwarding Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API