Legal Opinion

Murphy Hardware Co. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ActioN against a carrier to recover penalties, tried by Quion, 3at Spring Term, 1908, of OhekoKEE. His Honor rendered judgment against tbe defendant, and tbe defendant appealed to tbe Supreme Court. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Tbe facts as set out in tbe record present tbis case:

On 4 February, 1907, tbe plaintiff instituted eight separate actions against tbe defendant to recover tbe sum of $2,000 penalties in eacli action (total, $16,000), under section 2631 of Revisal of North Carolina, for failure of defendant .to receive a drove of 80 bead of cattle, tendered to the defendant at Murphy, N. C., for shipment to Richmond, Ya. The eight actions came on for hearing at the Spring Term, 1908, of the Superior Court of Cherokee' County, and for convenience and. by consent were consolidated by his Honor, O. H. Guión,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Bagg v. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gage v. Arkansas Central RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1954
  3. Warren v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  4. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD v. JenkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. JenkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API