Legal Opinion
Loeffler v. Target Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 2009No. B199287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
173 Cal.App.4th 1229 (2009)
___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___
KIMBERLY LOEFFLER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.
No. B199287.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
May 12, 2009.
Lange & Koncius, Joseph J. M. Lange and Jeffrey A. Koncius for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
The Kick Law Firm, Taras Kick and G. James Strenio for Michael McClain, Avi Feigenblatt and Gregory Fisher as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Morrison & Foerster, Miriam A. Vogel, David F. McDowell and Samantha P. Goodman for Defendant and Respondent.
Alston…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bower v. AT&T Mobility, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Blass v. Rite Aid of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2009
- Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014