Legal Opinion

State v. Boyce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 2007No. 129A06PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether defendant’s act of restraint and removal in preventing the victim’s escape from her residence, at a time when defendant’s subsequent robbery with a dangerous weapon had not yet begun, was sufficient to support a conviction for second-degree kidnapping. Because we find defendant’s conduct was legally sufficient to constitute the separate, complete act of second-degree kidnapping and, moreover, that the kidnapping facilitated the accompanying robbery, we affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The pivotal facts are as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. ChinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. In Re DRHCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. BandyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API