Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 2014No. 94PA13-2PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

Today we examine the scope of an appellate court’s review after it concludes that a defendant’s conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence. When confronted with such a situation, our longstanding practice has been to determine whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a lesser included offense of the convicted crime. If so, we recognize the jury’s verdict as a verdict of guilty to the lesser included offense. The Court of Appeals therefore erred by refusing to consider whether defendant’s actions constituted the lesser included offense of attempted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. McNairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. In re J.D.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. In re K.M.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. GatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API