Legal Opinion

In Re DRH

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 2008No. COA08-349PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Juvenile was adjudicated for robbery with a dangerous weapon and felony conspiracy. Juvenile claims the trial court erred by (1) entering two separate dispositions when juvenile was adjudicated for both offenses in the same session of court, and (2) finding that juve nile had six delinquency history points and a high delinquency history level. For the following reasons, we vacate and remand for resentencing as to issue one and find no error as to issue two.

I. Background

The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 15 May 2007, Abe 1 and Shawn were at Jamie’s apartment in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re P.Q.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API