Bell Cab Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These actions of tort, tried together, arise out of a collision between a taxicab and a freight car attached to the defendant’s train which was crossing over the *335Boston and Worcester Post Road in the center of the town of Northborough. The first action is to recover for damage to the plaintiff's taxicab; the second is for personal injuries to the operator of the taxicab; and the third is for personal injuries to the plaintiff who was a passenger in the taxicab. At the close of the evidence the defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict in each of the three cases. In the first and second…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Minihan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- McGlauflin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Horowitz v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Lincoln v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Sluskonis v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Vozella v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Ladd v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Rivet v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.