Ladd v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
These are the defendant’s exceptions taken at a trial of an action brought by the four occupants of an automobile to recover damages for injuries sustained when *118the said automobile struck the center of a freight train travelling across a public crossing in. Sudbury at about midnight on February 3, 1951. All four occupants recovered for personal injuries. Besides, the jury found for Ladd for consequential damages for injuries to his wife and also for damage to his automobile. The case went to the jury upon common law counts, including the alleged failure of the defendant to give adequate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Peterson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Hubbard v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Carey v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Evans v. Yegen Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Holmes v. Trustees of Boston & Maine Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983