Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Snapp & Associates Insurance Services, Inc. v. Robertson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2002No. D036202PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Snapp & Associates Insurance Services, Inc. (Snapp), appeals a judgment in favor of defendants Malcolm Bruce Burlingame Robertson and Robertson-Rock Insurance Agency (together Robertson) entered after the trial court determined in a bifurcated trial that its action for conversion and related counts is time-barred. Snapp contends it raised triable issues of fact regarding when it knew or should have known of potential claims against Robertson, and the statutes of limitations were tolled by Robertson’s fraudulent concealment of facts giving rise to claims…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Rita M. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API