Legal Opinion
Malekzadeh v. Wyshock
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided April 7, 1992No. Civ. A. 11,783PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor. .
Pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 5714, Respondent Thomas R. Wyshock (“Wyshock”) has moved to vacate part of an arbitration award. Because the Arbitrators did not exceed their authority, Wyshock’s motion must be denied and, pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 5714(d), the Award must be confirmed.
I
On March 7, 1986 Wyshock and the petitioners in this action: Abdollah Malekza-deh, Deborah A. Malekzadeh, Parvis So-rouri and Sally E. Sorouri entered into a Partnership Agreement for the development and management of a partnership known as Meadowood II Enterprises. The Malekzadehs and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. North American Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Amoco Oil Company v. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 7-1, Inc. And Paul A. SemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- The Timken Company v. Local Union No. 1123, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Beebe Medical Center, Inc. v. InSight Health Services Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Health Plan of Nevada, Inc. v. Rainbow Medical, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.